Studded Tyre
Pirelli Ice Zero 2
Performance car drivers who insist on rigid sidewall support, direct steering feedback, and motorway stability.
4 tyres delivered from519 €Free delivery: Svenska Gummihuset
Pirelli Ice Zero 2 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10
Italian precision handling challenges Arctic grip mastery: Pirelli Ice Zero 2 vs Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10.
Verdict:
Pirelli Ice Zero 2 appeals to spirited drivers who value taut steering response and minimal squirm on dry highways. Nokian Hakkapeliitta 10 delivers superior peace of mind when conditions turn truly hazardous with polished ice and thick slush.
Physical Test Benchmarks on Ice
Emergency braking from 50 km/h on smooth ice. Data: Nordic winter test averages.
Pirelli Ice Zero 228.9 m
Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 1028.4 m
Braking difference: 0.5 m (Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10 stops shorter)+0.5 m
Pirelli cabin noise71 dBAudible studs
Nokian cabin noise71 dBAudible studs
Direct Performance & Cost Matrix
| Feature | Pirelli Ice Zero 2 | Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10 |
|---|---|---|
| Braking distance on smooth ice (50 → 0 km/h) | Approx. 28.9 m (Strong dual-stud bite) | Approx. 28.4 m (Test winner, 0.5 m shorter) |
| Dry tarmac composure & high-speed stability | Rigid, exceptionally composed, zero squirm in corners | Softer Nordic carcass flexes more noticeably on bare tarmac |
| Slush planing resistance | Good slush evacuation with wider tread blocks | Top-tier lateral slush dispersal in deep thaw tracks |
| Set price 4 tyres delivered (205/55 R16) | Approx. 610 € (Approx. 15 € cheaper) | Approx. 625 € |
Studded Tyre
Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10
Drivers placing uncompromising ice braking, snow acceleration, and sub-zero grip above tarmac sportiness.
4 tyres delivered from625 €Free delivery: Rengas-Online.com
Want to explore all winter tyre models?
Open the full 3-tier matrix with live stock and accurate delivered prices.
Other Popular Winter Comparisons
Continental VikingContact 8 vs Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10VikingContact 8 for quiet efficiency; Hakka 10 for absolute ice safety.
Continental VikingContact 8 vs Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta R5Continental edges on wet/dry asphalt; Nokian shines on arctic snowpack.
Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10 vs Michelin X-Ice North 4Hakka 10 is better value and sharper; Michelin leads in multi-year longevity.
Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10 vs Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2 (W429)Hankook saves 170 € with great grip; Hakka 10 gives 2.4 m shorter emergency stop.
Continental VikingContact 8 vs Michelin X-Ice SnowMichelin is cheaper and longer-lasting; Continental is whisper quiet.
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Michelin X-Ice SnowGoodyear offers crisper handling; Michelin leads in tread longevity.
Continental IceContact 3 vs Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10Nokian leads on ice; Continental offers calmer tarmac manners.
Goodyear UltraGrip Arctic 2 vs Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10Goodyear is quieter and 45 € cheaper; Nokian leads in deep snow.
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice 3 vs Continental VikingContact 8Goodyear handles crisper on tarmac; Continental wins in cabin silence and efficiency.
Michelin X-Ice North 4 vs Continental IceContact 3Michelin reigns supreme on ice; Continental leads in tarmac composure.
Bridgestone Blizzak Spike 3 vs Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta 10Bridgestone is remarkably close and 35 € cheaper; Nokian wins in icy cornering.
Hankook Winter i*cept iZ3 vs Nokian Tyres Hakkapeliitta R5Hankook saves 140 € with solid snow manners; Nokian provides vital ice margins.
Nokian Tyres Nordman North 9 vs Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2Nordman leads on snow with Hakka heritage; Hankook is quieter on tarmac.
Triangle IcelynX TI501 vs Hankook Winter i*Pike RS2Triangle saves 165 € for town runabouts; Hankook stops almost 3 m shorter on ice.